|

Juan Ramón Matta-Ballesteros List of Movies and TV Shows

Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436, 444, 7 S.Ct. 421 ; Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522, 72 S.Ct. Matta-Ballesteros, a Honduran, became involved with the enterprise in 1982 or 1983, and attended meetings where drug trafficking plans were discussed and decided. Felix-Gallardo and Matta-Ballesteros imported large amounts of cocaine into the United States on a number of occasions. At one point during their cocaine trafficking, Matta-Ballesteros and Felix-Gallardo grossed over $5 million a week from this enterprise.

Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436, 7 S.Ct. Matta-Ballesteros argues that the district court erred in admitting audiotape recordings of Camarena’s torture and interrogation at Lope del Vega because there was an inadequate showing of authenticity and chain temple tech center of custody, and the tapes and transcripts were unduly prejudicial under Fed.R.Evid. We review the district court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Black, 767 F.2d 1334, 1342 (9th Cir.), cert. Denied, 474 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct.

SCOR, 40th Year, Resolutions and Decisions at 24, U.N.Doc. Though we may be deeply concerned by the actions of our government, it is clear in light of recent Supreme Court precedent that the circumstances surrounding Matta-Ballesteros’s abduction do not divest this court of jurisdiction in this case. Since we have already concluded that the relevant treaty does not prohibit the abduction, “the rule in Ker applies, and the court need not inquire as to how respondent came before it.” Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. at 662, 112 S.Ct. In the shadow cast by Alvarez-Machain, attempts to expand due process rights into the realm of foreign abductions, as the Second Circuit did in United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267 (2d Cir.1974), have been cut short. The Supreme Court has long held that the manner by which a defendant is brought to trial does not affect the government’s ability to try him.

“Judicial economy justifies reliance on the jury to follow the instructions of the court that segregate the evidence and limit the applicability of the evidence to each defendant.” United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 448 (9th Cir.), cert. The district court did not abuse its discretion in trying Matta-Ballesteros as he was charged. By the late 1980s, Matta had become extremely wealthy and employed thousands of people in the businesses he owned. Matta also possessed investments in coffee, tobacco, spice, cattle, and dairy operations and founded several agricultural and construction firms in Honduras.

803 because he failed to show as a preliminary matter under Fed.R.Evid. 104 that the events necessarily occurred in one of the four Guadalajara municipalities. There are 2,800 other municipalities in Mexico where the marriage and birth could have occurred.

Similar Posts